<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaign letter of the week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livinginadigitalworld.com/2008/02/15/campaign-letter-of-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livinginadigitalworld.com/2008/02/15/campaign-letter-of-the-week/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://livinginadigitalworld.com/2008/02/15/campaign-letter-of-the-week/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aha. Adventures in Digital Marketing in their biography of Priya Prakash have said what I was trying to say but in a much more succinct manner.

&quot;Priya is a proponent of user centered design and believes that it will play a key role in the future of marketing.  Agencies are limited by their briefs to some degree, in what they receive as instruction from the client, and the client&#039;s own vision of what they think the future of marketing is going to be. Agencies need to be able to separate themselves from this to help stretch the true boundaries of future marketing.&quot;

http://digitalmarketing.typepad.com/adventures/2008/03/chinwag-live-to.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha. Adventures in Digital Marketing in their biography of Priya Prakash have said what I was trying to say but in a much more succinct manner.</p>
<p>&#8220;Priya is a proponent of user centered design and believes that it will play a key role in the future of marketing.  Agencies are limited by their briefs to some degree, in what they receive as instruction from the client, and the client&#8217;s own vision of what they think the future of marketing is going to be. Agencies need to be able to separate themselves from this to help stretch the true boundaries of future marketing.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://digitalmarketing.typepad.com/adventures/2008/03/chinwag-live-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://digitalmarketing.typepad.com/adventures/2008/03/chinwag-live-to.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://livinginadigitalworld.com/2008/02/15/campaign-letter-of-the-week/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe Greys and A&amp;E are correct in their thinking, &quot;given the client what they want&quot;.  I do not believe this is any different from Mr Scognamiglio central point about knowing the consumer and understanding how they interact, communicate and create conversations about a brand across all touch-points  

I actually think the biggest challenge today is being in the right place at the right time, and knowing what positive course of action to take when these conversations / interaction are taking place with your product / brand / company.

Examples of brands not getting this and acting foolishly are  numerous.  My personal fav is:

http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2005/08/68492]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Greys and A&amp;E are correct in their thinking, &#8220;given the client what they want&#8221;.  I do not believe this is any different from Mr Scognamiglio central point about knowing the consumer and understanding how they interact, communicate and create conversations about a brand across all touch-points  </p>
<p>I actually think the biggest challenge today is being in the right place at the right time, and knowing what positive course of action to take when these conversations / interaction are taking place with your product / brand / company.</p>
<p>Examples of brands not getting this and acting foolishly are  numerous.  My personal fav is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2005/08/68492" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2005/08/68492</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://livinginadigitalworld.com/2008/02/15/campaign-letter-of-the-week/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinginadigitalworld.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree with the impetus lying with the consumer savvy agencies. 

The question for the future, for me, is to what extent this consumer-focus clashes with &quot;giving the clients what they want&quot; as articulated by Grey and A&amp;E. 

The last marketing aeon seemed to come from brave, creative people giving clients what they &#039;need&#039; rather than what they want. (There is the famous story of George Lois threatening to leap from a Madison Avenue window if his ad was not bought, for instance.) The client simply wanted to improve their bottom line. The agencies had to fight to show them how to do it. The agencies knew better. They were expert. And they knew it.

Is such an aeon upon us today?

There will be some business who are genuinely motivated by giving to their consumers - the &#039;pull&#039; marketeers whose messages we seek willingly. This lot will be a pleasure to work with. 

But there will, inevitably, be other businesses who are motivated purely by making more money and &#039;pushing&#039; to meet their targets. For whom the customer is but a cash cow to be milked and milked and milked again (or should that read &#039;mailed&#039;). 

Their marketing deparments are calibrated to fit the ancien régime.

I would suggest it is the agencies with the biggest balls that will enjoy the most success here. The ones who represent the consumer in meetings. People who will say &quot;&lt;i&gt;your customers do not want this....it&#039;s YOU who wants this...this is a bad idea. No.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;. 

I imagine it will take salespeople...risk takers... mavericks. The next generation of Bernnbachs, Saatchis and Wundermans.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too cynical to suspect what a lot of clients &#039;want&#039; is the status quo. 

Sounds like it&#039;s going to be fun.

Stomach ulcer anyone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with the impetus lying with the consumer savvy agencies. </p>
<p>The question for the future, for me, is to what extent this consumer-focus clashes with &#8220;giving the clients what they want&#8221; as articulated by Grey and A&amp;E. </p>
<p>The last marketing aeon seemed to come from brave, creative people giving clients what they &#8216;need&#8217; rather than what they want. (There is the famous story of George Lois threatening to leap from a Madison Avenue window if his ad was not bought, for instance.) The client simply wanted to improve their bottom line. The agencies had to fight to show them how to do it. The agencies knew better. They were expert. And they knew it.</p>
<p>Is such an aeon upon us today?</p>
<p>There will be some business who are genuinely motivated by giving to their consumers &#8211; the &#8216;pull&#8217; marketeers whose messages we seek willingly. This lot will be a pleasure to work with. </p>
<p>But there will, inevitably, be other businesses who are motivated purely by making more money and &#8216;pushing&#8217; to meet their targets. For whom the customer is but a cash cow to be milked and milked and milked again (or should that read &#8216;mailed&#8217;). </p>
<p>Their marketing deparments are calibrated to fit the ancien régime.</p>
<p>I would suggest it is the agencies with the biggest balls that will enjoy the most success here. The ones who represent the consumer in meetings. People who will say &#8220;<i>your customers do not want this&#8230;.it&#8217;s YOU who wants this&#8230;this is a bad idea. No.</i>&#8220;. </p>
<p>I imagine it will take salespeople&#8230;risk takers&#8230; mavericks. The next generation of Bernnbachs, Saatchis and Wundermans.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too cynical to suspect what a lot of clients &#8216;want&#8217; is the status quo. </p>
<p>Sounds like it&#8217;s going to be fun.</p>
<p>Stomach ulcer anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

