Comments on: Nude twitter outrage in London

By: riksta

riksta — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:25:23 +0000

@Nudeinascarf didn’t actually follow anyone – so that’s how they avoided need to censor Twitter – and is also probably a reason why they didn’t get loads of followers themselves. Agency could have done with using a conversation specialist – somebody like Robin Grant at wearesocial.net perhaps.

By: nomad

nomad — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:24:50 +0000

i was wondering how much they actually censor Twitter

By: riksta

riksta — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:05:05 +0000

You may be right. A colleague said they thought it was EHS. I’ll try to check and post correct details.

By: Russell W

Russell W — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:15:11 +0000

I thought it was CMW?!

By: riksta

riksta — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:35:46 +0000

Direct marketing agency – Evans Hunt Scott

By: Fred Bradnick

Fred Bradnick — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:34:53 +0000

Who are EHS?

By: riksta

riksta — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:30:07 +0000

EHS. Very tenuous link.

By: Fred Bradnick

Fred Bradnick — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:25:12 +0000

I agree they should have been naked…booo hisss! It did make me smile though.

By: Russell W

Russell W — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:24:47 +0000

Just checked and the page jumps to http://www.peugeot.co.uk/vehicles/peugeot-car-range/peugeot-308-cc/!!

No connection between nude in a scarf and a peugeot – who is the agency they got that wrong didn’t they??